The best Side of case law de listed plot from abandoned proerty supreme court

nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair into the offender and also the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

14. While in the light with the position explained over, it can be concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be thought of for no fault of his very own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency from the duration of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners might search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

However it's made apparent that police is free to just take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also make sure regard from the family lose in accordance with legislation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security from the house is concerned, which will not be public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been reached. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated above. Read more

PLR is actually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

Numerous judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name about the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. Therefore, this petition must be allowed Read more

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, it is also a well-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.

twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons having their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to perform away with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does deliver for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.

Problems or Errors When you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a poor link or simply a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Heart.

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent and also the case under appeal, Most likely overruling the previous case legislation by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This may perhaps transpire several times since the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first from the High Court of Justice, later in the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his enhancement on the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions read more are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.